Suki's Safe Haven is exactly what it sounds like - a safe place for victims of veterinary incompetence, negligence, and abuse to obtain information about this disturbing but important subject. It's a companion site to The Veterinary Abuse Network, which grew out of a site founded in 2000 in memory of Suki the Cat, REPEATEDLY MISTREATED BY EDWARD J NICHOLS DVM, CRESTWAY ANIMAL CLINIC, San Antonio, and to alert the public of serious flaws in state board systems that routinely look the other way to protect the vets - and not our pets. You'll find original posts and articles as well as links to victims' stories, resources, other sites and blogs, and media coverage from all over the net. We'll also cover First Amendment issues for those of us who have been sued by the very veterinarians who mistreated our pets and then used the legal system in an attempt to silence us.

We will never forget. We will never be silenced.

This is an independent consumer advocacy blog and not associated with any government agency in any way.

April 3, 2012

Mattie's Story: Pet Guardians Entitled to Informed Consent and Consumer Information Sheets (CIS) on Veterinary Drugs


One of the topics I get the most mail about – next to complaints about unauthorized procedures and how to find a good animal law attorney – is the subject of informed consent, especially on veterinary drugs that are prescribed to our companions.

I often think of Mattie, beloved dog of Ohio journalist Kelly Kaczala, who took her grief over what happened to Mattie in 2005 at the hands of veterinarians Robert (Bob) Esplin, DVM and Ross Mahowald, DVM at Sylvania Veterinary Hospital in Toledo, Ohio, and used her journalistic skills to help others avoid tragedy.


Kelly's heartbreaking account of Mattie's death is found here, part of a special report in presspublications.com's “Pets as Family” special report. Kelly served as project manager and contributed heavily to the section, along with writers Melissa Burden, Larry Limpf, J. Patrick Eaken, and editor Tammy Wilhelm. I urge you to read it. 

Here's what jumped out at me (italics and boldface mine):

"With humans, the doctor has an obligation to give you full information and obtain your informed consent before they proceed to do anything," said Prof. David Favre, of the Animal Legal and Historical Center at Michigan State University.

Vets, though, are not, he said.
"How often does this happen? Very seldom," said Favre.
[Dr. Bob] Esplin said he doesn’t inform pet owners about the risks of drugs, treatments and surgeries because “it just never comes up.”
It never comes up? Excuse me, but isn't it your job as a veterinarian to bring it up? When you visit your own physician, is it your responsibility to bring up risks, side effects, and contraindications of drugs, treatments and surgeries, or should the doctor be let off the hook in the event that you or a member of your family dies because the subject didn't "come up"?
Esplin's cavalier comment made my blood run cold, and then boil, at the thought of how many unsuspecting clients and innocent animals may have met Kelly and Mattie's fates because vets like Esplin don't inform pet owners about potential risks? (He said it himself, folks, so he can't come after me with some ridiculous defamation claim like he did to Kelly when she sued him for negligence. Both suits later settled.)
Here's the takeaway: 1) Go to a vet who doesn't use drug Consumer Information Sheets at your own risk, and 2) remember Mattie's Story the next time you run into a vet who decides to take matters into his own hands without bothering to obtain informed consent from the owner.
Remember that the best pet owners are the best informed. Then they can make the best choice of veterinarian who respects their rights and wishes as the guardians of and decision-makers for their beloved companions. 
Related reading: